Meetup Groups meet face-to-face to pursue hobbies, network, get support, make friends, find playgroups or even change the world!
Get on the Internet to get off the Internet!
You'll get invited to our Meetups as soon as they're scheduled!
| From: | avantstrangel |
| Sent on: | Monday, May 12, 2008 12:11 AM |
yeah but edwards never came to support obama. he's had plenty of chances and still he refuses. is he planning to give his delegates to hillary!!!?! If I were Obama I'd pick a woman so SHE could run for president. But I don't know if America is ready for THAT much change. --- Rob Dyer <[address removed]> wrote: > How I agree with this commentary!! It is why she > must not be our candidate or V.P. I cannot imagine a > V.P. who will continue to see herself as the true > champion of the underprivileged (of all people) and > of those who would stop at nothing to see her > President. > She has many good qualities, but Herbert highlights > everything that would make me hesitate to vote > Democrat if she were the candidate. The more we talk > of all those she would bring as VP to vote for > Obama, the more it makes me think of Edwards, who > comes from this background and has been all his > career their genuine, sincere and admirable > champion. > Rob Dyer > > > -----E-mail d'origine----- > De : Meredith <[address removed]> > A : [address removed] > Envoyé le : Samedi, 10 Mai 2008 23:11 > Sujet : [barackobama-165] Bob Herbert on the > Clintons > > > > > http://www.nytime...> > > > > > May 10, 2008 > > Op-Ed Columnist > > Seeds of Destruction > > By BOB HERBERT > > > > > The Clintons have never understood how to exit the > stage gracefully. > > > > > Their repertoire has always been deficient in grace > and class. So there was Hillary Clinton > cold-bloodedly asserting to USA Today that she was > the candidate favored by ?hard-working Americans, > white Americans,?? and that her opponent, Barack > Obama, the black candidate, just can?t cut it with > that crowd. > > > > > ?There?s a pattern emerging here,?? said Mrs. > Clinton. > > > > > There is, indeed. There was a name for it when the > Republicans were using that kind of lousy rhetoric > to good effect: it was called the Southern strategy, > although it was hardly limited to the South. Now the > Clintons, in their desperation to find some way ? > any way ? back to the White House, have leapt > aboard that sorry train. > > > > > He can?t win! Don?t you understand? He?s > black! He?s black! > > > > > The Clintons have been trying to embed that > gruesomely destructive message in the brains of > white voters and superdelegates for the longest > time. It?s a grotesque insult to > African-Americans, who have given so much support to > both Bill and Hillary over the years. > > > > > (Representative Charles Rangel of New York, who is > black and has been an absolutely unwavering > supporter of Senator Clinton?s White House quest, > told The Daily News: ?I can?t believe Senator > Clinton would say anything that dumb.??) > > > > > But it?s an insult to white voters as well, > including white working-class voters. It?s true > that there are some whites who will not vote for a > black candidate under any circumstance. But the > United States is in a much better place now than it > was when people like Richard Nixon, George Wallace > and many others could make political hay by > appealing to the very worst in people, using the > kind of poisonous rhetoric that Senator Clinton is > using now. > > > > > I don?t know if Senator Obama can win the White > House. No one knows. But to deliberately convey the > idea that most white people ? or most > working-class white people ? are unwilling to give > an African-American candidate a fair hearing in a > presidential election is a slur against whites. > > > > > The last time the Clintons had to make a big exit > was at the end of Bill Clinton?s second term as > president ? and they made a complete and utter > hash of that historic moment. Having survived the > Monica Lewinsky ordeal, you might have thought the > Clintons would be on their best behavior. > > > > > Instead, a huge scandal erupted when it became known > that Mrs. Clinton?s brothers, Tony and Hugh > Rodham, had lobbied the president on behalf of > criminals who then received presidential pardons or > a sentence commutation from Mr. Clinton. > > > > > Tony Rodham helped get a pardon for a Tennessee > couple that had hired him as a consultant and paid > or loaned him hundreds of thousands of dollars. Over > the protests of the Justice Department, President > Clinton pardoned the couple, Edgar Allen Gregory Jr. > and his wife, Vonna Jo, who had been convicted of > bank fraud in Alabama. > > > > > Hugh Rodham was paid $400,000 to lobby for a pardon > of Almon Glenn Braswell, who had been convicted of > mail fraud and perjury, and for the release from > prison of Carlos Vignali, a drug trafficker who was > convicted and imprisoned for conspiring to sell 800 > pounds of cocaine. Sure enough, in his last hours in > office (when he issued a blizzard of pardons, many > of them controversial), President Clinton agreed to > the pardon for Braswell and the sentence commutation > for Vignali. > > > > > Hugh Rodham reportedly returned the money after the > scandal became public and was an enormous political > liability for the Clintons. > > > > > Both Clintons professed to be ignorant of anything > improper or untoward regarding the pardons. Once, > when asked specifically if she had talked with a > deputy White House counsel about pardons, Mrs. > Clinton said: ?People would hand me envelopes. I > would just pass them on. You know, I would not have > any reason to look into them.?? > > > > > It wasn?t just the pardons that sullied the > Clintons? exit from the White House. They took > furniture and rugs from the White House collection > that had to be returned. And they received $86,000 > in gifts during the president?s last year in > office, including clothing (a pantsuit, a leather > jacket), flatware, carpeting, and so on. In response > to the outcry over that, they decided to repay the > value of the gifts. > > > > === message truncated === "Poor indeed is the person whose pleasures are dependant upon another's permission!" http://www.spider...
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yah...
![]()